Monograph:
The Latin Verb: Aspect and Actionality. Lviv. 2017.
Handbooks:
1. The Latin Language. L’viv. 1994 (in the co-authorship)
2. 7. The Latin ABC-Book.L’viv. 1995 (in the co-authorship).
3.The Latin Language. L’viv. 2008 (2 nd edition) (in the co-authorship).
4. Historical Latin Grammar. L’viv. 2008.
Articles:
1. The Notion and Terms of the Category of Tense in the Writings by Roman Grammarians // Foreign Philology. – 1990. – Vol. 99: Problems of Classical Philology, № 25. – Pp. 72-78.
2. Aoristic Imperfect in Latin Language of the I – II AD. UkrINTEI 14. 12. 1992 –  №  1942 – Uk 92.
3. To the Question on the Polysemy of the Presence Indicative in Latin Language. UkrINTEI 14. 12. 1992 – №  1943 – Uk 92.
4. The Categories of Aspect and Tense in the Verbal System of Latin Language of the I – II AD. The Review of the Dissertation for the Candidate of Philology. – L’viv, 1993.
5. The “Apology” by Mykhaylo Malynovskyi /Translation from Latin// Documents of International Taras Shevchenko Scientific Association. – 1993. – V.125.- P. 383 – 391 (in the co-authorship)

6. The Modal Semantics Of the Forms of the Indicative in Latin Language // Foreign Philology. – 1995. – Vol. 108. – Pp. 127- 134.
7. Perfectum Indicativi in Latin Language //Annual Papers in Classical and Romance Philology. – Vol. 2. – Odessa, 1995. – Pp. 14 – 22.
8. The Derivation and Semantics of the Future II in Latin Language // The International Scientific Conference to 100 Anniversary of Y. R. Kourylovych. Sketches of the Report. – L’viv, 1995. – Pp. 63 – 64.
9. The Latin Verb and the Category of Aspect // The International Scientific Conference Commemorating Professor A. O. Biletskyi  “Actual Problems of Modern Philology”. Sketches of the Report. – К., 1966. – P. 103.
10. Greek Loans in Roman Poetry of the Classical Period // All-Ukrainian Scientific Conference “Advanced Linguistic Concepts of the End of the XXth century”. Sketches of the Report. – L’viv, 1996. – P. 259.
11. The Secondary Verbs in -sco in Latin Language // The Problems of the Semantic Description of Lexical and Speech Units. Materials of the Reports at the International Scientific Conference. – Part 1. – Minsk, 1998. – Pp. 186 – 188.
12. The Verbal Aspect in Ukrainian and Latin Languages // The Problems of Contrastive Semantics. – К., 1999. – Pp. 273 – 277.
13. The Categories of Aspect and Tense in the Indo-European Verbal System // Foreign Philology. – Vol. 112. – 2001. – Pp. 68 – 71.
14. The Problems of the Latin Verbal Aspect in the Language Studies of the XXth Century // The Materials of the International Scientific Conference “The Scientific Heritage of Professor S. V. Semchynskyi and Modern Philology”. – Part. 2. – К., 2001. – P. 172 – 175.

15. Semantics of Aspect and Reference Point; the opposition “infectum/perfectum” in Latin//Visnyk Lvivskoho universytetu. Series “Inozemni movy”.Vol. 10. 2002. P. 249-256.
16. Aspectuality in Latin Language: history and perspectives of research.// Visnyk Lvivskoho universytetu. Series “Inozemni movy”.Vol. 12. 2005. P. 239-247.
17. The Development of Semantics of Futurum II in the Early Latin//Visnyk Lvivskoho universytetu. Series “Inozemni movy”.Vol. 13. 2006. P. 171-175.
18. Indo-European Suffix -ske/o- and its Realization in Latin//Movni i konceptualni kartyny svitu [Linguistic and conceptual pictures of the world]. 2007. Vol. 21/3.P. 257-261.
19. Verbal Prefixation in Early Latin: Prefix per- // Modern problems of linguistic research and methodology of foreign language teaching for special purpose in high school. Lviv. 2007. P. 196–198.
20. Gebrauch und Funktion der Erzähltempora im frühmittelälterlichen Latein // Limbaje şi comunicare IX. Evoluţia şi functionarea limbii – perspective normative în noul context European. Partea I. Suceava, 2007. Р. 308–314.
21. Verbal Aspect and Modality: Latin imperfectum // Visnyk Lvivskoho universytetu. Series “Inozemni movy”.Vol. 15. 2008. P. 267 – 273;
22. Expression of Verbal Plurality in Latin // Scientific Papers. Series: Philological Sciences (Linguistics). 2008. Vol. 75 (4). Kirovohrad. P. 116–119.
23. The Role of Aspectual Opposition in Narrative Context // Mova i kultura [Language and Culture]. 2008. Issue. 10. Vol. III (103). Kyiv. P. 126–132.
24. Aspect and Text Structure // «Od slova put’ verstayuchy do slova…». In Honour of R. P. Zorivchak. Lviv. 2008. P. 670–680.
25. Means of Expressing of Inkohativity in Latin // Scientific Papers. Series: Philological Sciences (Linguistics). 2009. Vol. 81 (1). Kirovohrad. P. 37–41.
26. The Latin Perfect: рerfectum or рraeteritum рerfectum // Nova filolohiia [New Philology]. 2009. Issue 35. P. 170–175.
27. Semantics and Pragmatics of Narrative Tenses in Late Latin // Linhvistychni studii [Linguistic Studies]. 2009. Issue 19. Donetsk. P. 54–58.
28. Aspectual Semantics of Predicate in Temporal Clause; Clauses with dum, donec, quoad // Inozemna filolohiia {Foreign Philology]. 2010. Issue. 122. P. 86 – 92.
29. The Category of Intensity and Latin Verb  //Nova filolohiia[New Philology]. 2010. Issue. 38. P. 222–228.
30. Concepts-Primitives and Aspectuality in Latin // Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni V. N. Karazina. Series: Filolohiia. 2010. № 910. Issue. 60/1. P. 125–129.
31. Semantics and Pragmatics of Narrative Tenses in Latin Poetry (Ovid “Metamorphoses, 2, 1-324) // Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni V. N. Karazina. Series: Filolohiia. 2010. № 901. Issue. 59. P. 36–39.
32. Principle of Organization of Functional-Semantic Field of Aspectuality in Latin // Linguistic and Methodological Problems of Foreign Language Teaching. Poltava. 2010. P. 523–525.
33. Actionality and Verbal Prefixation: Prefix con- // Naukovy visnyk Chernivetskoho universytetu; Zbirnyk naukovykh prac’. 2011. Issue 565. Romance and Slavonic Discourse P. 147–150.
34. The Actional Parametrs of Latin Verb: Verbal Character// In Honour of Professor Bohdan Vasylovych Maxymchuk. L’viv. 2011. P. 257–265.
35. Іnfinitivus perfecti in Latin Language: semantical and functional peculiarities // Studia linguistica. 2011. Issue 5/2. P. 3–9.
36. Resultativity and its Expression in Latin // Actual Problems of Linguistics and Linguodidctics
in the Light of Modern Approaches. Комрат. 2011. P. 105–109
37. Aspectual Conflict in Latin // Prystrast’ nauky. Lviv. 2012. P. 179–188.
38. Suprapreteritality and Latin Plusquamperfectum // Non progredi est regredi. In Honour of Paslavska Alla Yosypivna. L’viv. 2013. P. 296–308.
39. Verbal Plurality in Late Latin: frequentative-intensive Verbs (on Ammianus Marcellinus’ “Roman History”)// Gregore Bostan – 75. Actual Problems of Romanian Philology. Chernivtsi. 2015. P. 549–558.
40. Durativity and Aspectual Semantics (in Latin and (Ancient) Greek) // Zolotaia strofa [Golden strophe]. 2014. Issue. 4. Krasnodar. P. 113–114.
41. Two Verbs with Semantics of limitativity: finire vs terminare // Indo-European Linguistics and Classical Philology — XXI. Sankt-Petersburg, 2017. P. 850–861
42. Functional-semantic Field of Limitativity in Latin Language // Universum: Philology and Art. 2017. № 4(38). URL: http://7universum.com/ru/philology/archive/item/4661
43. Verba perfecta in typologischer Hinsicht // Studia Europaea Gnesnensia. 2017. Vol. 15. P. 299–305
44. The Perfect and Semantics of Perfectivity in Latin // Meridian Critic.2017. Vol. 28. N 1. P. 245-251.
45. Latin of “Vita Haimhrammi” by Aribo from Freising // Indo-European Linguistics and Classical Philology — XXII. Sankt-Petersburg, 2018. P. 1343–1354.
46.Vita Corbiniani episcopi Baiuvariorum: a linguistical approach // Docendo discimus. In honour of Sulym Volodymyr Trokhymovych. L’viv. 2018. P. 338 – 350.

47. Suavis und dulcis bei Aurelius Augustinus // Graeco-Latina Brunensia. 2018. Vol. 23. № 2. Р. 77-94.

48. Funktsionalno-semantychne subpole prospektyvnosti v latynskiy movi [The functional-semantic subfileld of prospectivity in Latin] // Naukovyy Visnyk Drohobytskoho derzhavnoho pedahohichnoho universytetu imeni Ivana Franka. Seriya “Filolohiochni nauky” (Movoznavstvo).-2018.-N 10.-P.    153-156.

49. Prykmetnyky dulcis ta amarus u tvorakh Verhiliya [ Adjectives dulcis and amarus in Vergil’s works]//Naukovyy visnyk Khersonskoho derzhavnoho universytetu. Seriya “Linhvistyka”.-2018. -N 34.-T.2.-P. 98-102.

50.Aspektualna semantyka nezalezhnoho konyunktyva v latynskiy movi  [Aspectual semantics of independent subjunctive in Latin]// Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu im. V. N. Karazina. Seriya “Filolohiya”.-2018.-N 79.-P. 181-187.

51. Between the Beginning and the End: on Intrateminality in Latin // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya.-2019.-N 59.-P.  141-154.

52. Indirekte Evidentialität in der lateinischen erzählenden Prosa des I-II Jhdt// Graeco-Latina Brunensia. 2019, Vol. 24/2, P. 33-52.

Reviews:

1. Baldi Ph. The Foundations of Latin, Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2002 // DO-SO-MO. Fascicula Mycenologica et Classica Polona. 2008 (200v latynskiy9). N 7. P. 189–196.
2. Cooley Alison E., The Cambridge Manual of Latin Epigraphy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012// Eos. Commentarii societatis philologae Polonorum.Vol. CI, Fasc. 1. P. 128-129